I was told that "James" was equal to Matthew Rush. then again, I was told that Chance was a clone of "Bill." However, if said equivalency is true, then given the variable of my own, I am only able to fit the head. Of course, this is conclusion is steeped in bias due to the lack of a comparable variable as well as the room of error in said process in which comparison was made. Namely, the classic ideological battle between synthetic and authentic.
Have no clue what I'm talking about? Then you haven't been paying attention to my blog very carefully, have you?
No comments:
Post a Comment